Lindemann Law

New provisions in company law from January 1, 2025: Clear rules against shell companies and retroactive opting out

Since January 1, 2025, new provisions have been in force in Swiss company law that specifically prevent bankruptcy abuses, prevent trading in over-indebted shell companies and provide a clearer structure for auditing law. With the introduction of Art. 684a CO and the revision of Art. 727a CO, the legislator is setting new standards in terms of transparency and creditor protection – and creating clear rules for opting-outs and shell company transactions.

This article answers the five key questions on the new regulations – in a compact, legally precise manner and with practical added value for entrepreneurs, board members and investors.

What are the main changes to the law to combat bankruptcy abuses?

The revision of company law entails fundamental changes. Firstly, the shell trade, i.e. the sale of shell companies, is prohibited under certain conditions – a reaction to numerous workarounds for de facto dead companies. Secondly, opting out is no longer permitted retroactively, which improves transparency and traceability in the commercial register.

In addition, it was decided to introduce a central personal database with a search function in order to better identify the beneficial owners of legal entities. Stricter activity bans apply to persons who have already been associated with fraudulent structures or bankruptcy offenses. Finally, the bankruptcy administration now has specific reporting obligations in the event of suspected abuse. The aim of all these measures is to strengthen creditor protection and prevent structural circumvention of the law.

What do the terms “shell company” and “shell trade” mean – and what is the difference to a shelf company?

According to established Federal Supreme Court case law, a shell company is a legal entity whose business activities have been completely discontinued and whose assets no longer exist – but which continues to exist legally and is still entered in the commercial register. Subsequent shell trading aims to avoid the expense of a formal liquidation and a complete re-establishment – usually in order to save time and costs.

In contrast, a shelf company is a deliberately founded, non-operational company with fully paid-up capital that has been prepared in a legally sound manner and has no economic history. While shell companies are now considered risky and potentially illegal, shelf companies – provided they are structured correctly – are still permitted.

What does the new Art. 684a CO provide for and what is the purpose of this provision?

The new Art. 684a CO regulates the conditions under which shell trading is not permitted. This is the case if a company cumulatively:

  1. no longer conducts any business activities,
  2. no longer has any disposable assets,
  3. is financially overindebted, i.e. has negative net assets, without necessarily being overindebted within the meaning of Art. 725b CO.

The purpose of this legal provision is not only the integrity of the commercial register, but in particular the protection of creditors, who should not be jeopardized by the resale of over-indebted shell companies. The legislator is sending this way a clear signal against abusive use of companies and is bringing regular liquidation for such shell companies back into focus.

What is the legal consequence of a shell trade?

A shell trade that is not permitted under Art. 684a CO is null and void under civil law – even at the level of the transaction covering the obligation. This means that ownership of company shares is neither transferred nor can it be cured later by registration (no valid execution). Crucially, acquisition in good faith is also excluded.

Similarly, bodies appointed after a shell trade are legally ineffective and obligations entered into by the company after the unauthorized acquisition have no legal effect. For new creditors, this means that they have claims for damages against the alleged board members – in analogous application of Art. 39 para. 1 CO, as they have acted without a legally valid board position and thereby caused damage that gives rise to liability.

What is new about opting out in accordance with Art. 727a CO?

According to the revised Art. 727a CO, the waiver of the limited audit (opting out) is only permitted for future financial years. A retroactive waiver – for example after the submission of a critical audit – is excluded. This means that annual financial statements without a prior audit obligation can no longer be “exonerated” retrospectively.

The prerequisite for a valid opting-out remains that the company employs a maximum of ten full-time employees on an annual average and that all shareholders agree. What is new, however, is that the waiver must be registered in the commercial register before the end of the current financial year. An audit waiver at the time of formation remains permissible, but once an audit obligation has arisen, it cannot be removed retroactively.

The aim of the revision is to better protect creditors in the event of imminent over-indebtedness and to prevent cases of abuse in which problematic audit reports were subsequently neutralized by retrospective opting-outs. With the new legal situation, such circumvention constellations are now effectively excluded.

Conclusion: Check structure – avoid risks

With the new provisions, the legislator is strengthening legal certainty and creating clear boundaries for permissible and impermissible company uses. The abuse of shell companies is effectively prevented, audit law is regulated more transparently and creditor protection is consistently enforced. Now is the right time for companies, executive bodies and investors to review existing structures and entries in the commercial register – and make legally compliant adjustments where necessary.

LINDEMANNLAW is one of the leading specialists in Swiss corporate law – be it for formation, restructuring, opting-out, shelf companies or dealing with commercial register authorities. Our expertise is your advantage: we recognize risks before they arise (e.g. M&A due diligence and avoidance of shell trade) and develop legally compliant solutions for your business objectives.

Come to us – we will help you to set up your company in a clean, secure and future-oriented manner. Whether you are a start-up, SME or investor: with us at your side, your business will receive the best legal advice.

Disclaimer: This publication is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal advice on your specific situation, please contact us directly.

Auctions in M&A for Banks and Asset Managers – Key Questions Answered

AIFMD in the EU: Scope, Compliance & Alternative Structures

Interview with Dr. iur. Alexander Lindemann: What the U.S. Appeals Court Ruling on Trump’s Tariffs Means for Switzerland

Related expertise

Scroll to Top